Tuesday, December 15, 2009

CTV NEWS

Cornwall abuse inquiry set to deliver report
Updated: Sun Dec. 13 2009 11:35:49

The Canadian Press

An inquiry spurred by murky rumours of a clandestine pedophile ring and cover-up conspiracy in eastern Ontario will release its final report Tuesday, four years after being struck.

The release is the culmination of the Cornwall inquiry, which ended up with a $53-million price tag examining institutional responses to historical allegations of sex abuse.

Some have openly questioned the value of an inquiry that spent so many years and so many millions of dollars probing how public institutions operated decades ago, as practices governing how abuse allegations are dealt with have since changed.

"I've always wondered how (the commissioner) is going to make recommendations on issues from the 1960s and '70s when so much of this has been taken care of already," said Claude McIntosh, a columnist for the Cornwall Standard-Freeholder.

"I would not want to say the inquiry was not needed, but when you look at the cost of it... it's a lot of money to spend."

The government estimates the final tab for the Ministry of the Attorney General will be $50 million, in addition to a $3.2 million special assistance grant for the city from the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Social Housing for costs the city incurred up to March 31, 2007.

Since that time, the city of Cornwall has had to pay $1.7 million itself for legal fees for representation of its police service. About $3.7 million of the money from the Attorney General's office has also gone toward those legal fees, but the city has been told it won't be reimbursed for the extra $1.7 million, said chief administrative officer Paul Fitzpatrick.

Lead commission counsel Peter Engelmann said the scope of the inquiry -- decades of institutional responses to sexual abuse -- forced them to take time to ensure everyone's voices were heard.

"When you look back on something you can always think of ways you could have done things faster or perhaps more efficiently," he said.

"But part of the big issue was not just looking at this issue, but looking at it thoroughly."

While the abuses discussed at the inquiry happened decades ago, the sexual abuse of children is an ongoing problem, and institutions everywhere can still learn lessons, Engelmann said.

It has been 10 months since closing submissions, in which the pedophile clan theory was cast as a fabrication spread by a misguided police officer and embraced by a panic-stricken community.

Public agencies ill-equipped to handle sex abuse allegations, the equation of homosexuality with pedophilia and the presumption of guilt of accused abusers were all also put forward as factors in how rumours of the sex ring took root.

While not officially in the inquiry's mandate, Commissioner G. Normand Glaude was urged in closing submissions to once and for all debunk the sensational pedophile ring tale.

To that end, Glaude is expected to touch on the saga of Perry Dunlop, the crusading police officer whose off-hours investigation is credited with unearthing genuine sex abuse allegations but also with fuelling rumours of a powerful, backroom pedophile clan.

Dunlop refused to testify at the inquiry largely of his own making, saying he had no faith in the justice system. He served several months in jail for contempt of court convictions.

Many eyes will also be on the Glaude's counselling recommendations. In closing submissions victims groups urged specialized support services for male victims of sexual abuse as well as a provincial ombudsman dedicated to their plight.

"It became very apparent through the inquiry how there are so few services for men who are survivors of sexual abuse and sexual assault that I can't imagine the report not making a recommendation about that," said David Bennett, who represented the Men's Project at the inquiry.

The Men's Project is based in Ottawa but established a branch in Cornwall through the inquiry, though funding is currently set to expire Jan. 15. They would like to not only see funding for that branch made permanent, but other such centres established around Ontario.

"My biggest concern is that the government will say, `We don't have funding for this,"' Bennett said.

"Our view on that is to not fund it will cost the citizens of Ontario a lot more."

The Men's Project estimates it would cost about $400,000 to $500,000 a year for them to operate in a mid-size city.

While the government hasn't given victims groups "any reason for optimism," they are hopeful at least some of the counselling funding recommendations will be implemented.

"I think they have to do something," said Dallas Lee, who represented the Victims' Group.

"You can't have an inquiry of this length and frankly of this expense and not do something."

In 1993, Dunlop was a Cornwall police officer when he came across documents showing one alleged sexual abuse victim had received a $32,000 payout from the Alexandria-Cornwall Roman Catholic Diocese.

Some of those involved believe Dunlop's hunger to root out pedophiles pressured victims to fabricate stories of a pedophile ring, while others believe he naively latched onto such tales in his blind pursuit.

The inquiry's watershed moment came in June 2007, when Ron Leroux recanted his admission to Dunlop that he had witnessed a clan of pedophiles who wore robes, burned candles and sexually abused young boys during weekend meetings in the 1950s and '60s.

Ontario provincial police launched their Project Truth investigation in 1997 and by its completion in 2001 they had laid 114 charges against 15 people, but found no evidence of a pedophile ring.

Of the men charged only one was convicted. Four died before their cases came to trial, four were acquitted, four had the charges against them withdrawn and two had the charges against them stayed over delays.

The Ontario government established the inquiry in April 2005 and it began hearing from witnesses in February 2006. When it was still plugging away in October 2008 the government stepped in and set an end date, with the report ordered due July 31, 2009.

As that deadline approached the inquiry asked for an extension and one was granted until October, but a second extension request pushed back the release until Tuesday.

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Hi, it's been a while

Hello, it's been a while since I wrote in here, I guess there are times that (time) passes me by and before you know it..well, it seems to be months have gone by.
Up to date with me, I am back with my husband.. we were separated again for about 2 months. It is still hard however to make things work as a couple but we are determined to fight through it as a family. We are going to seek counseling as a couple (never done that before)in hopes that this will help. I think also that this shows our daughter that you just can't give up, that until all else fails you have to at least try for ALL of the family. There are no guarantees but I pray that it works:)I haven't had any flashbacks in a while and there hasn't been any self mutilations in a few years:)"This is good:)" I haven't been to my counseling in a couple of months...I don't know if that is OK with me? I can feel a bit of anxiety and have cried a few days ago and I don't know why? I am hoping that it's just my thyroid medication change? I am feeling good about some changes in my life...concerning my daughter, I am more attentive to her needs which makes me feel that I am more connected:) I am not sure that I am happy about the results that are soon to come out about the Cornwall Inquiry. I know that it will not be what it should be and that's, "Justice". I am however happy that some people now know what this town was about. That some of the secrets are now out! It doesn't however make sense to me why or how these people could sit there on the stand say what they did wrong and get away with it?? They were either transfered to another place, their secrets were covered well by high profile people, and or they silenced their victims. Yet the courts heard what they did wrong and they were not charged?? Life is full of unanswered questions and I don't know if I will ever get any answers.
Someone had just recently added their comment in here accept it wasn't a comment but a link to buy some drugs or should I say some medications, one of them was Viagra...I had decided for the first time to delete a readers comment...I was not happy about it because I felt that this was NOT appropriate for this place. It's not that I don't believe in some medications and that some are important but I felt not good about this one. I hope you didn't mind..I don't want to hide anything from you because it's important to keep the truth in here but I had no choice.
It would be nice if you could leave a comment in here for me, I love to read them:) They help me to see and feel that I am not alone, maybe in some way I could help:) I know that sometimes I write about different things all at once:) sorry about that, it's just that my mind wonders and I feel I have to let you know everything I am thinking about and I don't want to miss a thing:) Well, for now I think that is it, it's time for me to cook supper:) people are getting hungry (they won't do it for themselves "LOL") I don't mind, it just makes me feel more appreciated:) Bye for now, hope to hear from you soon:)

Your friend,

Brigette

Friday, September 4, 2009

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Life change for me

Hi, it's been a very long time since I wrote in here. I am truly sorry that it has taken so much time. I guess I needed a long break from what was going on with the Inquiry. It has taken a HUGE toll on me. I am sad to say that I am now seperated from my husband. It's been since the middle of August 09 that we haven't been together. It somehow doesn't surprise me that this was evident ( as sexual abuse victims find it very hard to live with the opposite sex) I am now on my own, my daughter is with me "THANK GOD" as she is my light, my inspiration, my mentor! I am finding myself living life now with dreams of starting to know myself and exploring the life outside the home, sort of speak "outside the box":)for some reason, having a man in the home seemed to stop me from doing things that were healthy for me, I didn't take care of myself...maybe I felt I had to please my husband and not me (something I was taught)but this is now changing. I will be on here more to write about things and I'm hoping it won't take as long this time.
So for now, I have to say bye

Until we talk again

Brigette

Monday, January 19, 2009

More We Live - Let Go

Help heal the victims/survivors of sexual abuse! Hear them and believe in them!

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Conspiracy Allegations Around Child Sex Abuse


January 13, 2009 — Conspiracy allegations surrounding child sex abuse cases in Cornwall are being described as "outrageous" by one of Ontario's top judges. Associate Chief Justice Peter Griffiths says there was no ring of truth to the suggestion that city police, the local diocese and area crown's office agreed to cover-up child sex abuse. Griffiths was the regional senior crown at the time who asked for an investigation. Griffiths ended his testimony by apologizing to the victims. (Hear audio clip below) Hearings continue at 9:30 this morning.

Personality Conflict Between Officer And Crown: McConnery


January 14, 2009 — The outcome of some local child sex abuse cases may not have been in jeopardy even though an investigating officer and a Cornwall crown attorney did not get along. The Cornwall Public Inquiry heard yesterday from Assistant Crown attorney Lorne McConnery who testified that former O.P.P. Detective Inspector Pat Hall did not like Crown Shelley Hallett. McConnery says he does not know if the conflict influenced child sex abuse cases. (Hear audio clip below) Hall previously testified at the inquiry saying Hallett lied about her knowledge of a child sex abuse case. Hallett is scheduled to take the stand later this week.

Dunlop Plays Role In Stay Of Charges Against Priest-Inquiry


January 15, 2009 — It appears Perry Dunlop played a major role in the delay of a child sex abuse case involving a Cornwall priest. Assistant Crown attorney Lorne McConnery has spent the past two days testifying at the Cornwall Public Inquiry about the Father Charles MacDonald prosecution. Charges against MacDonald were stayed in 2002 after a judge ruled MacDonald's right to be tried in a reasonable time was violated. Court documents show the judge said Dunlop caused a large part of the delay because he failed to share information with police officers during the investigation. However, McConnery testified he did not believe the Crown's office could be responsible for Dunlop's actions. Dunlop is the former Cornwall police officer who did an off-hours investigation into child sex abuse allegations in the area. He served seven months behind bars last year for refusing to share his story at the inquiry. Meanwhile, McConnery says there is a failure in the courts when it comes to prioritizing trials that have been adjourned. (Hear audio clip below) Section 11(b) is part of the Charter of Rights that guarantees accused persons are tried within a reasonable amount of time. Hearings continue at 9:30 this morning.

Monday, January 12, 2009

Ontario Hears Why Quebec Got A Conviction And Cornwall Didn't


January 09, 2009 — Did "reasonable doubt" play a role in why a priest was acquitted of sexual abuse in Cornwall but later convicted in Quebec? Assistant Crown attorney Alain Godin told the Cornwall Public Inquiry yesterday that he prosecuted a number of Project Truth cases in the 1990s including Father Paul Lapierre. Lapierre was acquitted in Ontario in 2001 but was later found guilty of similar charges involving the same complainant in a Quebec court. Godin says Lapierre was not convicted in Ontario because he testified and defended himself. Lapierre did not testify at his Quebec trial. (Hear audio below) Hearings continue this morning at 9:30am.

Has Interest Been Lost In Cornwall Public Inquiry?


January 09, 2009 — With only 16 hearing days left to go at the Cornwall Public Inquiry before they wrap things up, the pressure is on to finish witness testimony. Lead Commission Council Peter Englemann says that means sitting longer days and being more selective with who they call to the stand. Englemann spoke on John Bolton's Cornwall Today and admits that due to its three year length, this inquiry has been difficult to follow. (Hear audio clip below) Englemann hopes that the inquiry's legacy will be that Cornwall is now an example of how to properly deal with sexual abuse allegations. (For the complete interview, click on John Bolton's Cornwall Today icon.)

Exemplary Record Results In Absolute Discharge For City Lawyer-Flanagan


January 09, 2009 — Why did a Cornwall lawyer receive an absolute discharge for attempting to obstruct justice in a child sex abuse case? Crown attorney Curt Flanagan says Malcolm MacDonald received an absolute discharge because he pled guilty to the charge and had an exemplary background. An absolute discharge means the accused is regarded as not being convicted of the crime. MacDonald pled guilty in 1995 to attempting to obstruct justice after arranging a $32,000 settlement and advising an alleged victim to drop his criminal complaint against a city priest. Flanagan told the Cornwall Public Inquiry today MacDonald made a "gross error". (Hear audio clip below) Hearings continue Monday at 9:30.

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

Inquiry Testimony In The Final Stretch


January 06, 2009 — Cornwallites have been looking forward to the end of the Cornwall Public Inquiry for a long time and it's almost here. January marks the final month of testimony, three years after the first of more than 150 witnesses took the stand. Some residents testified about their personal battle with sexual abuse while various experts weighed in on the long term effects. Dozens of others including police officers, lawyers and organizational heads detailed their institution's response to child sex abuse allegations. The Ministry of the Attorney General's Office is the final institution to testify. That office has faced its fair share of criticism because there was only one criminal conviction after 15 local men faced over 100 sex related charges. Cornwall's former Crown attorney Don Johnson is the next witness. Hearings resume at 9:30am today.

Sex Offender Not Placed Under Certain Release Conditions


Sex Offender Not Placed Under Certain Release Conditions-Inquiry
January 06, 2009 — There is little explanation why a sex offender in Cornwall was not under certain release conditions in the 1980s. Former Crown attorney Don Johnson told the Cornwall Public Inquiry today he does not know why Jean Luc Leblanc was able to contact victims and be around children. Johnson says that would not be the case today. (Hear audio clip below) Leblanc was sentenced to three years probation in 1986 on gross indecency charges. Leblanc plead guilty in 2001 to additional sex related charges. He is currently behind bars. Hearings continue.
Audio:

Wednesday, December 31, 2008

Child sexual abuse song Be A Voice with lyrics

Be a voice for the victims/survivors of Cornwall Ontario, Canada! Please take the time to sign our petition and let the victims know that YOU HEAR THEM! Justice and truth must come out in this town! Thank you

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Local Fiery Death Ruled A Suicide


Local Fiery Death Ruled A Suicide
December 29, 2008 — Local O.P.P. have now closed their investigation into the fiery death of a man whose body was discovered last month inside a burned-out vehicle near the Cornwall Regional Airport saying the death did not involve foul play. Police say the death was self-inflicted and that the fire seemed to have been set off by the victim. The man's identity is still being determined, with DNA samples being examined in Toronto. The body was so badly burned it took days following the incident to determine the victim's gender.

Thursday, December 18, 2008

Enough!!

Hello, today I was just reading the article about my father Raymond Rivette when he was sentenced in 1992, it's at the bottom of this page. I read the second one and couldn't help but notice something very important to me. The Judge mentioned that even though my father wasn't deemed a pedophile he is a danger to children especially his grandchildren if he returned to drinking???????? That raises many concerns with me! For one: Does that mean that alcoholics or drinkers are a danger to their children or grandchildren, that they would sexually abuse them??? It wasn't the drinking that made my father do the things he did to me...most of the time he was sober. The drinking was just an excuse, I don't understand how they could say that he is a danger to children only if he drank! My father also did things to my girlfriends and once I remember my mother telling me that he slept with over 21 women she could count and knew of! My biggest concern is that there is a little boy that lives across the street from him...I don't know if he still lives there but I phoned the Cornwall Children's Aid to tell them that this little boy goes over there to play with him and they just laughed at me and told me I don't have any proof!! I told them that I am the proof!! My mother wouldn't do anything to stop my dad if he were to do something to that little boy, because she never did anything to stop my dad from doing things to me! I don't understand why Cornwall is trying so hard to protect these perpetrators!!
I know that Christmas is soon to be here and this topic I should save for later but I just can't help myself to pull away from the thought that the sexual abuse might still be happening and there is nothing I can do to protect any child from Cornwall! The authorities don't seem to care in Cornwall and that really upsets me! My father not only touched me as you see in the newspaper article, it was much more than that, to me it was a life time, at least till I was 21. I am strongly thinking about charging him for rape and what he did to me when I was 14, and my mother knowing about it and taking me to the doctors for an abortion!
Part of me says that it is over that there is nothing I can do about it...but another strong part of me says that if I don't...he may do it to someone else..how painful would that be if I found out that he did something to some child and I could have done something to protect that child! I told CAS in Cornwall but nothing was done...so what do I do now?? I just frustrates me that the judge said that...because I know that drinking doesn't cause a person to molest or rape another..it has to be that in their minds they are already a predator...nothing to do with drinking...where did they get such a statement?? Did they take surveys from drunk people? Are you capable of raping or molesting a child because you drink?? because that is what they are saying...that is what the judge said ( or the Kingston place he went to for assessment) if that is where the comment came from then we are all in deep dirt, because if they believe one can molest because of drinking then there is a lot more people out there then we would want to believe! That is truly impossible, I totally disagree with that...and again..my father didn't have alcohol on his breath when he was raping me!!! He didn't have to because I always did what I was told...my mother made sure of that!! OK, now I am not to happy here...I am getting upset...this really touched a cord in me!! When will this go away???

Mom if you are reading this...I hope you can see what you have done to me...you always stood by dad no matter what...you sacrificed your children for him!! You brought me into this world and yet instead of treating me like I was your daughter you treated me like I was your replacement...you know when you and dad would get mad at each other and he wanted to have sex with you and you didn't...you yelled and screamed at him..( I remember, I was downstairs and at night I could hear you screaming...)Well, instead..dad came down to my room...either he gave you the sleeping pills to take or you took them, I don't know...but all I know is that he came down stairs to finish what you couldn't do! You knew this and didn't stop it!! Remember when I was 14, that is when you took off with your sisters to go on a vacation after pepere died...that's when dad took advantage of me more because YOU weren't there!!!!!! Many months later you took me to that butcher doctor, do you remember that?? You told aunt Jackline what dad did to me...I know this because I phoned you up when you were over there and I was bleeding to death...remember?? I have to hear from you Mom...I need to know WHY you did this!!! I don't want a phone call from you to say the least but I want you to tell me WHY....comment back here and tell me WHY because I deserve the answer!!! If you couldn't protect me back then because you had your own problems or what ever...then please set me free by at least telling me WHY you did that to me...WHY you took me to that butcher doctor!! because I need to know!!!
If you can't say it to me...than get one of my sisters to comment on here for you!!
I can't continue on to have a happy life if this haunts me so much...I need these answers...I am sorry that I have to put it out here for everyone to read but you have left me no other choice...you told me to keep quiet about this but I can no longer keep it in...now everyone will see...and I didn't want this to go that way..but I am sure you didn't want me to get pregnant with dads kid neither!!!! but that happened and I can't do anything about that....do you know the physical damage because of what this butcher doctor did to me...do you know what my insides are like now??? I have a lot of physical problems because of what he did!!! Can you take that away for me mom??? Why was it that when I had my first son that you told me you were sorry that I had to have a c-section....was it because the butcher doctor didn't want me to remember what he did to me??? Was it because he knew that he messed it up so bad inside that I couldn't have delivered naturally??? why did I need to have a needle when I was pregnant for my first son??? because that special needle you take ..you only get because of the first child you have because the second child could die because of my blood type...I didn't find out this info for many many years later....my mind and body had a complete shutdown!! Why would that be MOM!!!
What a way to remember or even think about when it's so close to Christmas...You know...I even no around the time and year down to the month...what it was like outside when it happened....what I was eating that day when dad did that to me...isn't that amazing how the memory knows this kind of stuff...how the memory even knows WHAT FOOD YOU ATE THAT DAY!!!! ENOUGH!!!

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

Christmas


Hello, I wanted to talk today about the Holidays, "which is not surprising for many people". I know that for many-Christmas is the best time of the year (which is very good)but as you might know-Christmas is hard for other people. There are families who find it hard to celebrate for many reasons, I can't say that it's money being the first thing...in my opinion I believe it's the memories of the adults Christmas that brings back a time that wasn't so happy; whether it's wanting to give their children everything that they didn't have or maybe not being able to give them much because they never had much. Unfortunately they believe that if they didn't have a Christmas why should their child have one, they might say,"Oh, get over it, I didn't have anything for Christmas that I can remember, so don't pout, be happy with what you have, some kids across the world don't even have gifts or even celebrate Christmas". Then with the parent saying this, the child's Christmas might carry into his or her family tradition thus causing a repeated dysfunctional Holiday. As for the parent that wants the child to have everything, it may cause a repeated-in the red- bank account if they don't have the money to give their child everything but spends what they don't have. I believe that is why many people have racked up credit cards and unpaid rent for January, they will do what ever is needed to give their child everything that they didn't have. "Is this good? I don't believe it is..because soon the parents after the holidays will start arguing over bills that haven't been paid because of Christmas and then they keep struggling to catch up. For the families that have the true meaning of Christmas and know that Christmas is NOT about themselves...that it's about their Children, that it's about sharing their time and love with them, example: baking together for the coming holiday, building snowman's, watching Christmas shows together, singing carols, reading the story of Saint Nick, and mainly just being their with them. Knowing that there can be a few gifts for the child..maybe one or two that the child really wants...what about making something for the child...I know the children of today would say..."What!! that's not what I asked for...OH, thanks.."
What if this Christmas you were to do that...maybe they wouldn't like it as much but they may get used to it if in return you spent more time with them..next year would be easier then the following year even better. I believe the children of today..most of them are used to getting what they want, again I believe it's the guilt parents have within themselves ( their past, maybe they spent to much time at work- guilt can add to this)One thing I thought of, what if the families that have a child that have way to many toys, and really doesn't even know what he or she wants for Christmas-what if the family spoke about maybe giving some of their toys for Christmas to others that don't have any...you would not believe the emotion that one can feel after giving...maybe just one toy the child can give...explaining and showing the "heart of Christmas"....starting this tradition might be a good one for when the child is really young, so when they get older they are use to giving and knows it makes them feel good. Wouldn't that be something to teach your child? and your child would eventually do this for his or her generation to be. I don't know...maybe I am just rambling on here:) I can say that I believe Christmas does make people feel more- whether it's good or bad...Christmas has a magical way of bringing in emotions and miracles. What about the families who have been far apart for many years because of hurt and then one Christmas..maybe this Christmas they call and for the first time they tell each other how they feel. Why is that? Could it be because Christmas is about a "child" a child....Christmas brings emotion because of OUR childhood....what it was like growing up, if we had Santa bring us toys or mom reading us a book or dad making that special sled or taking us out on a ride down the snowy hill...or our sister's and brother's playing with us with our new toys. Maybe it wasn't all Rosy at Christmas...abuse that happens, yelling going on, parents being drunk, fighting siblings, something you had asked Santa for and it didn't come under the tree.."you know, that special toy you always wanted". Christmas does bring up our past; what do we do with it? We can always start a new tradition...we can keep the same traditions that we were use to...we can celebrate it on a different day...it is our choice to change or keep the same for our children. If Christmas is hard for you each Holiday...then maybe it is time for a change...maybe you can do something different this Holiday...I know it's hard for people to make change...but if you don't...you will never know:) It's not a sin to change a tradition..especially if it's YOUR family now...if you decide to keep your tradition because Christmas is always a happy time for you then I would say " I am happy for you that you are having a wonderful Christmas:)sharing that with your children is something healthy for them to carry on to their future Christmas traditions.
I use to remember when my Christmas childhoods were not the greatest, unfortunately I carried pain to many other Christmas's with my children when they were young..I did a lot of crying on this Holiday. Staying in my room for the day while the children celebrated Christmas with their father, was something they were use to. I was always sick...heart broken, confused and sometimes got drunk, wanting to forget the pain was something I always tried to do, "numb it away" other times when company came around...I use to put, shall I say " a face on" till our company left, going to the washroom off and on just to cry, then straightening up myself and walking back into the living room like nothing happened. Times for me have changed...a lot of counselling...I know longer do this, I have seen my actions and talked through the pain, then realized it didn't have to be this way...I didn't have to ruin it for my children nor myself...I could make that change, that tradition....things at Christmas did change and I am still here:) I am not saying that I am really happy at Christmas..it still effects me a bit...but I am working on it:) I haven't spoken to my sister's in a long time...my mother I haven't spoken to all but 5 minutes which in itself was very bad in 2005 and before that, haven't seen her since 2001..and well..I'm working on memories and trying to heal, my father...I have pity for him because he is going to be going...well only God knows....as for my brother, I love him dearly and wish I could see him but because of the hurt that both of us went through ..well, I believe it would be hard to talk or see each other...because in reality, seeing each other reminds us of the past and that can't be stopped...we both have to be ready to talk about it, accept and heal together. I believe God will know when it's time...as for now, my children need me and my youngest needs a happy tradition to pass on to her family:)
OH! I have great news!! I am now officially a GRANDMOTHER!!!:):):) How wonderful is that!! My oldest son and his wife, had a BABY BOY!! My Grandson!:) He was born on December 14th...it is so hard to tell you how I felt when I held him in my arms for the first time, knowing that my oldest baby had a baby of his own...and by the way..now I can say I have grey hair because I am a proud Grandma:) How much appreciation I had for his wife...she did the most important thing in this world and created a miracle "bringing a child into this world" I never looked at it this way...not even when I had my own children...I never realized how important I was for bringing my beautiful children into this world.........WOW, I am now speechless!! This world is all about "CHILDREN" even ourselves, we were once children...lets just take a moment through the Holidays and look at our family...our own children and if you don't have children find the child within you and GIVE your child a great big hug and do the things you always wanted to do around Christmas time " Have fun! play games, songs, sleigh rides, movies, a warm blanket by the fire, decorate, there is so much more...allow yourself to have this and share it because YOU are worth it and most importantly ..so is your child or children:)

Have a wonderful Christmas:) May all your blessings be given to your family and your laughter be shared with others!:)
Until next time, have a great night and or day!

AM 1220 Cornwall's Crown Attorney Gets Set To Testify


Cornwall's Crown Attorney Gets Set To Testify
December 15, 2008 — Cornwall's Crown attorney will be taking the stand at the public inquiry this week. Murray MacDonald will explain how he dealt with prosecutions relating to historical child sex abuse cases. Cornwall lawyer Don Johnson is also on the schedule. Inquiry staff say Johnson was the Crown from 1972 until 1991. However, neither of them will take the stand until former O.P.P. Detective Inspector Pat Hall finishes his testimony. Today will be his tenth day as a witness. Hearings begin at 9:30 on Tuesday.

Friday, December 12, 2008

Lawyer Offers Kind words To Inquiry Witness


Lawyer Offers Kind Words To Inquiry Witness
December 12, 2008 — There were kind words for an O.P.P. witness from a lawyer at the Cornwall Public Inquiry. In an unusual move, Michael Neville who represents two men accused of abuse, shared a few comments about former Detective Inspector Pat Hall after questioning him yesterday. (Hear audio clip below) Hall has testified for nine days about his role in a prominent sex abuse investigation dubbed Project Truth. Neville represents former probation officer Ken Seguin and Father Charles MacDonald but neither have ever been convicted. Hall's testimony continues when hearings resume Monday at 9:30.

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

Blamed Dunlop for failed prosecution:retired cop


Please click on the link "Blamed Dunlop for failed prosecution:retired cop" above this, it will take you to the article that was written by the Standard Freeholder, comments are also there! You will not believe it! Again a police officer puts the blame on someone else for his own wrong doings!
Pictured here above, is Det. Insp. Pat Hall
Staff Photo/Pritchard-TP08120899

I found this article while surfing, concerning "Perry Dunlop" London Free Press "Letter to Editor"


Letter to Editor
UNLESS otherwise noted, these letters are to be considered unedited. The opinions expressed in the letters and comments are those of the writers and not of The London Free Press.

politics
Folk Hero, Perry Dunlop
Editor Every Newspaper Possible Perry Dunlop a Folk Hero Perhaps the very losing of their jobs, causing of family strife and stress or even going to jail for what they see or saw as injustices is what keeps most whistleblowers silent. Perhaps that is the very desire of malicious doers of fraudulent and deviant, even criminal behaviors. They like to hide behind smoke screens and enablers such as weak kneed co-workers and boss's who want to protect issues from public knowledge at all costs.

I think that a lot of what has come to the position Perry finds himself in has evolved as a direct result of just that kind of repugnant but cultist cohesion of clubist's fraternities/mentalities, which have been a normal reaction for all time. Hang the one for the sake of all.

Well, I believe this nation owes Perry a cultist counter reaction. Every able bodied person, children at schools and those that believe in doing the right thing at all costs must write phone and even support Helen and Perry Dunlop in any way they can. This plea is one of mine. I don't know many address's but if you do, follow-up now to your MPP, your MP, any anyone else you can think of that together we can raise such a stink people will begin to realize that though the law is the law and should apply even and equal to all, it really hasn't in this case.

I read a good book lately called Outrage. It was about a guy who kill another. He turned himself in and demanded his punishment. Well, the man he killed had been out on bail after raping and murdering his daughter. Touching story. His wife died of heart failure and he was overwhelmed with pity. Seems the man out on bail had raped another girl but all was thrown out of court because the police forgot to notify his first lawyer of the new charges, so the distraught man felt he had to take things into his own hand. He was prepared to give his life for the sake of others. Finally true justice prevailed and the jury set him free. Yes, the law is the law but prevailing potential harm to others was averted. Perry is such a man.

No one agrees with vigilantism, but we do agree with some wars. To Perry, I believe that his cause was a war and he had no choice but to save what he saw was many other potential victims in the Cornwall activities unless he acted as he did.

Now it is our duty as citizens of this fine country to stand behind him and do our part to see that his injustice is forgiven by the courts. Two wrongs don't make a right but the Project Truth Inquiry here in Cornwall seemed fit in overstepping its bounds by evoking testimony from raped male and female victims only to have all that dredging thrown out of court by another court for overstepping its mandate. It's time for leniency for Perry.

Canada. its time to stand before his sentencing on March 5 in a Toronto court for standing on principle. The good of others at the risk of ourselves is his honor. He needs our anger and support now.



POSTED BY: Dave Windsor, Cornwall
POSTED ON: February 22, 2008
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments
What message are we giving By arresting Perry Dunlop what kind of message are giving to pedophiles? That its OK to hurt children and get away with it? That the citizens of Cornwall are blind and week? That we parents have no right to protect our children, from sexual crimes because the people who did them are priests,cop,lawyers and other people who are suppose to hold a higher standard. Shame on the police force for not backing a true hero.And how much was the judge paid? I hope you have a conscious and it drives you insane. It should be a short trip!!!
POSTED BY: Cecile Foubert

AM 1220 Covering "Cornwall Public Inquiry

Some Potential Witnesses/Victims Not Interviewed-Inquiry
December 10, 2008 — It seems some potential witnesses or possible child sex abuse victims were not approached by the police during the Project Truth investigation. Former O.P.P. Detective Inspector Pat Hall says he did not want officers knocking on doors and soliciting complaints in 2000. He says police had been working on the case since 1997 so people had a few years to consider whether to come forward. Hall says if someone had an allegation they could call them. (Hear audio clip below) The O.P.P charged 15 local men with over 100 charges during the investigation but there was only one connection. Testimony wrapped up early due to the weather. Hearings continue this morning at 10:30.
Audio:

AM 1220 Covering "Cornwall Public Inquiry


Inquiry Looks To Public For Recommendations
December 10, 2008 — The Cornwall Public Inquiry is on the home stretch with many looking to the last chapter. Commissioner Normand Glaude announced today the inquiry will start taking submissions from the public on how child sex abuse allegations should be dealt with. (Hear audio clip below) Those phase two submissions deal with healing and reconciliation. Meanwhile, parties with standing at the inquiry will have a chance to make closing remarks in February. Inquiry testimony continues today with former O.P.P Detective Inspector Pat Hall.

Monday, December 8, 2008

OPP Officer Lashes Out At Inquiry


Local News
Home news Local News OPP officer lashes out at inquiry, Engelmann
OPP officer lashes out at inquiry, Engelmann
Posted 4 mins ago


A retired Ontario Provincial Police officer delivered a scathing critique Monday of the Cornwall Public Inquiry in general, and its lead commision counsel in particular.

Reading from a prepared statement, Det. Insp. Pat Hall compared the long-running sexual abuse inquiry to his own work with Project Truth, the OPP's four-year probe into allegations a clandestine ring of pedophiles operated in the Cornwall area.

“During the past week, I have been continuously asked why various investigations took so long,” Hall told inquiry commissioner Normand Glaude.

“Mr. Commissioner, why is this inquiry taking so long?”

Hall then suggested the commissioner should not have chosen “labour lawyer” Peter Engelmann as its main counsel, when “all the matters surrounding this inquiry are criminal in nature.”

Engelmann is a partner with Ontario labour law firm Sack Goldblatt Mitchell, and is described on the inquiry's website as a “leading labour, human rights, and employment lawyer” in Canada.

Hall also saved some vitriol for Queen's Park, which has announced that testimony at the inquiry – which has been hearing witnesses since February 2006 – must wrap up by the end of January.

“It's a sad day when politics calls for an inquiry, and politics shuts it down,” said Hall.

“There should be an inquiry into the conduct of this inquiry.”

For the full story, see Tuesday's Standard-Freeholder.

Sunday, December 7, 2008

In regards to a comment left about " Law of Averages"

I was not trying to determine the number of predators in and around Cornwall, I was hoping to cast a little light on the harsh reality of vast numbers of people who are directly or indirectly affected by the few who believe society children are their playground for their perverted compulsions. The final number I had was not to represent the number of molesters, but the number of people who have been touched in one way or another from a loved one being a victim in Cornwall over a what are they claiming, 50-60 year period. Many of these people have moved, have passed on or chose to forget their experiences. You may not like the fact it's Cornwall they are saying this about, but I can't think of any other town having an Inquiry let alone something of this magnitude being held. This is definitely a problem the whole world shares but I don't know if any other towns police would be giving such sketchy testimony full of holes and despite all knowing what was going on, not one did anything positive about it except the one police officer they imprisoned, first for not following proper reporting to his superior officer, so he could dispose of the matter the way they did with everything else. Then throw him in jail for not having faith in the Legal System or for that matter the agenda set up for this Inquiry. He did what he could do to protect the children of Cornwall and as we have been told, every check point put in place to be sure this amount of vile corruption can't take place either assumed someone else would catch it or just plainly found a scapegoat to blame the end results on. Evidence destroyed, police on leave, people unable to testify due to medical reasons, so many people being charged proven to be guilty yet still given a discharge agreed to by a crown that years later was proven guilty himself of the same such behavior. Many other cities have these other problems you've mentioned but how many are being investigated for running the prostitution trade, or the police dealing the drugs or officials of the town being blamed for the crimes being committed. As for grow up, be a man and give my daughter the life she deserves, "you know nothing of our family life". My daughter knows bad things exist. They teach that stranger danger in every school across Canada except I'm guessing Cornwall. We just received her A's and B's Report card and we are so proud of what she has become. We spend so much time with her and she helps me with almost everything I do. We are all so happy with our home life, and buddy, I'm not even from Cornwall but I have come to know many scared, self harming, insecure people who moved from there and they all say the same thing about that place. There is an underground evil there that must be watched over by the devil himself. You take statistics and word them as you wish to create bad feelings for the group. Try saying to them what's said, all over Canada there are at least 25,500 people who's lives have been touched by the sexual crimes gone on without penalty in Cornwall. Not victims just people who care for others. Brothers, sisters, all family, try friends, girlfriends, parents, grandparents. You had better open your eyes and have a good look at what is happening. Do you really believe all this is not true or are you hiding your own abuse because you feel your manhood threatened by saying it happened to you or someone you know. Or are you one of the abusers who are trying to take the focus away from Cornwall?

By: Jim

Sunday, November 30, 2008

Law of Averages

I heard on several news broadcasts that the average pedophile abuses 85 people before they are caught! If the system failed and there were no controls in place to make them fear being caught, one could just imagine how much higher that average number could jump. If anyone concerned could imagine that higher number-then multiply it by the staggeringly high number of predators that just happened to call Cornwall home, OK, I'll pause while you calculate it.....now imagine after all those years a very low estimate would be one of their parents living, they have married just once and have had only one child. So, being Conservative take your last number and multiply it by 3. That does not figure in siblings, grandparents, friends, or any other family or friends for that matter. I have kept all my estimates low. I took the 85 people times 100 pedophiles in Cornwall,( there were more than 100 charges laid in the Project Truth investigation alone )" times only 3 friends, family, or loved ones, the total estimate- 25,500 people, fully half the population of the town. Some of the officials of that town were partially responsible for imprisoning the only police officer that would come foreword for the safety of children. By the way, the rest of Canada believes he shouldn't have been charged, he was given a GOLDEN AWARD when he came out. I have been very conservative in my estimates. That means the town of Cornwall's Priest's, police and many other prominent people have torn apart the lives of at least 25,500 people! I want to emphasize that the victims are in no way responsible for the fall-out, for lack of a better word, from what these monsters have done to them. I mean for example, my wife Brigette is loved by both myself and our daughter and there is nothing that can change that, but because of what that town has put her through, it hurts both of us to see her pain. To know first hand that this kind of evil exists and to be supportive in all parts of her recovery, counseling, and dealing with her past. She has the physical scars and we all share the emotional scars dealt out by these cowards. At least we know with work and in time, we will all grow stronger and better but the predators will always live in fear that one of the numerous victims they have threatened and hurt- will grow strong enough to fight back. Every day every one of them could possibly hear that cell door slam behind them, and I don't have to tell anyone how much respect they will receive being locked up with several people whose lives went bad, usually because they themselves were abused when young by someone just like them. That is a perfect picture to end my thoughts with....

By: Jim

Hello


Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I added reviews from http://www.linkreferral.com "they are comments made about my website that I would like to share with you. The comments are at the bottom of my page "just a little hint:) if you want to get to the bottom of the page quicker, just left click and hold on the right bar and scroll down" it's a lot faster if you want to get to the bottom of the page, You already may have known this :) I hope you are enjoying being here:) I enjoy having you here and love the comments that you send to me. If there is something that you would like to ask me, please leave a comment after my post or you can leave it in the box under "Leave a comment or chat" it's on the right side of this page. I will get back with an answer as soon as I can. Thank you, and have a beautiful day!

Your Friend,

Brigette

Saturday, November 22, 2008

Deepak Chopra on: Releasing Emotion Toxins

"Releasing Emotion Toxins"

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

A View from below

How beautiful the world can be-in the eyes of a child. How beautiful the world once was-in the eyes of an adult. A day, I choose to see this world through sunglasses, better to have pretended then to have seen the change of human behaviour-to animal instincts. What causes this change-lost sheep in this world with no guidance, looks for safety-finds none, searches for acceptance-empty, searches for pleasures-no knowledge, seeks the truth-finds lies. The world has fallen into a pattern of power, money, control, greed, and worst of all conformity to social inadequacy- where laws are made unjustified, where truth can be hidden in the blind wall of justice. Why do we choose to conform-no hassles, why do we choose to follow-we need guidance-(the lost sheep must go somewhere)-we pay the price for our suspicious freedom. Why does one ponder-sitting in a chair-"time" to pass by, why does one "wish", "dream", "hope"-all taken away- we are not the money makers-we are the makers money-we are their wish, dream, and hope-they have theirs-they have ours- so, we stay on this lily pad of-conformity, some say "jump" and you will drown, others say, "hop" we will catch you. No one ever said, "take a large leap! There is no testing of the waters-do and it will be done!

By: Brigette

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

Abuse that breaks a childs trust

Hello, I wanted to add this link above because it is so true. Being sexually abused by my dad has made me in the past create personalities. I am still going for therapy every week or mostly every week, trying to understand how to cope with my personalities. It has been a long journey. Life has been difficult. I am trying to communicate with you, as you see I am having a hard time to speak at this time. It's been a while since I spoke with you, I apologize, lately I have not been feeling very well. I have been back and forth to the doctors testing for heart problems and blood clots, the doctors have been puzzled as to what is going on with me, that is no surprise for me. My physical body has been mostly torn apart on the inside. Many operations, many unexplained happenings. I am not well put together I guess you can say.I am at a standstill right now in my life, it's like my body is walking around but nobody home. I do however for some reason get really upset when I read articles from Cornwall to do with the Inquiry. I don't really understand why but all I can say is most of the time if I read the article I start to pace the floor upset. I guess in some way I am frustrated with the fact that the perpetrators are again being protected and the victims are being crucified all over again. What is going to happen when this Inquiry is all done? It's like going to the councillors and spilling out everything that was horrific in your life then the councillor saying, "OK, your time is up", you stand there in disbelief, your stomach starts to ache and burn and your throat hurts, you want to cry but if you start crying "you may never stop", so what do you do? I just thought of somebody who left in here a comment, one of their comments were, "throw out your computer and stop reading articles". I only wish I could, but for me "this is healing" that almost sounded like my mother talking, she would tell me to leave the past behind you and move forward. Well if anyone knows about being sexually abused for 20 odd years by a family member and others, one would know that you can't just put it behind you. It eats at you till you deal with it, till you bring it out in the open, if you don't then you will hide it with all kinds of "crutches" healing hurts bad, really bad, you would do anything to avoid it. Until you start to talk about it your body will crave for something in replace of it "your pain" for another. It might be self mutilation, alchol, drugs,excessive compulsions, anything, until you start to let it out. When you are done "or you think you are done" only to notice that there is more, more that you didn't think was there. You say to yourself." I talked about everything, how can I possibly have anymore" you continue for a long time and even after when you reach that time, there is still more. I know this sounds like a broken record that goes on and on, you say, " will this ever stop, will I ever get better, will the memories ever stop, will I ever have a normal life. I for one have not reached the point that I can say " this is it, this is all that has to come out, I am healed. My journey is a long one, it's been 21 years of sexual abuse, it won't happen over night for me. I was once told by a friend that " I survived the abuse, so I can survive the journey that is in front of me.
I don't know if I made much sense tonight, I don't feel like I am strong inside right now. Maybe tomorrow will be better for me. Well I must say goodnight, I wish you well for tomorrow, have a free day that was given to you " what you choose to do with it, is your choice.

Your friend,
Brigette

Saturday, November 1, 2008

OPP Investigated probation officer

Local News
Home news Local News OPP investigated probation officer
OPP investigated probation officer
Cornwall Public Inquiry
Posted By TREVOR PRITCHARD, STANDARD-FREEHOLDER
Posted 15 hours ago


The Ontario Provincial Police investigated now-deceased probation officer Nelson Barque more than a decade before he pleaded guilty to sexually abusing a teenage boy, the Cornwall Public Inquiry heard Friday.

Det. Const. Chris McDonell testified one of his former colleagues at the OPP's Lancaster detachment, Const. Terry Seguin, looked into allegations against Barque in 1980 or 1981.

No other witness at the long-running sexual abuse inquiry has said anything about the OPP investigating Barque -- who committed suicide in 1998 - in the early 1980s.

However, Barque's one-time supervisor, Peter Sirrs, testified last November that he contacted both the Cornwall police and the RCMP in 1982 after hearing complaints about Barque.

Barque resigned from the Cornwall probation office that year, after Sirrs' investigation revealed he was having sex with at least two probationers and providing them drugs and alcohol. Three years later, Barque was convicted of indecent assault.

"Were you aware (of) the circumstances under which he left (the probation office)?" inquiry commissioner Normand Glaude asked McDonell.

"Yes, I was," said McDonell.

"And how did you find that out?" asked Glaude.

"Because they originated out of Lancaster," said McDonell. "I knew the officer that investigated it."

No details emerged Friday about the depth of Const. Seguin's investigation.

McDonell spent 26 years at the Lancaster detachment before retiring in 1999. He is now the deputy mayor of North Glengarry.

Continued After Advertisement Below

Advertisement


Commission lawyers were asking McDonell about Barque because his name had come up during the retired officer's 1993-94 investigation into another probation officer, Ken Seguin.

Before he committed suicide in November 1993, Ken Seguin had also been suspected of sexually abusing probationers.

McDonell investigated his death and, later, extortion allegations made by Ken Seguin's family against David Silmser, one of the probation officer's alleged victims.

One of the people McDonell interviewed was Jos van Diepen, who had been a colleague of both Barque and Ken Seguin.

According to records of the February 1994 interview, van Diepen said he "always felt (Barque and Ken Seguin) had a little thing going" and that he "didn't know if they were gay but they acted differently."

Inquiry lawyer Karen Jones asked why McDonell didn't look closer into the "unsavory things" he was hearing about Barque.

McDonell said he figured van Diepen was talking about his colleague's earlier investigation.

"But it's not 100 per cent clear, is it?" asked Jones. "There's a possibility there could have been other sexual misconduct on the part of Nelson Barque being revealed to you in February 1994, but you didn't do any further investigation on that."

"No I did not," said McDonell.

After Ken Seguin's death, his family complained to the OPP about McDonell, saying his investigation into his suicide had been biased.

Nevertheless, McDonell was still assigned to look into the extortion allegations against Silmser, who had called Ken Seguin the night before he died.

Citizens for Community Renewal attorney Juda Strawczynski asked McDonell -- who said he never knew of the family's complaints -- whether he felt it was appropriate to be assigned the extortion case.

"I always did what I was told or asked," said McDonell. "If they asked me to go on it, I would go on it."

Neither the abuse allegations against Ken Seguin, nor the claims of extortion involving Silmser, were ever proven in court.

The inquiry resumes Nov. 10 with a new witness.

Article ID# 1276297

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

I never really left

When I was able to work full time, I never took a holiday. I never thought I had the time to and I always thought resting my mind and body wouldn't help, it would just leave more for me to do when I returned. So, acting as I always have, my only break from these Cornwall issues was to walk away totally. They have caused my family so much pain and sorrow, I wanted my life back without the memories of the past there to jeopardize it's growth. I have learned two very important lessons in my actions. The first is there comes a point when everyone needs a break from their daily routines and problems to rest and regain your focus. The second is the past is always with you like a festering wound UNTIL it gets the attention it requires. Most often it just means to allow yourself to accept the bitter reality that, yes, it did happen to you and allow the pain to be felt. Only then can we move on to live in the present and hope for the future. There is only so much room for us to force back harsh memories and they steal the room or emotion meant for today. I believe the victims of this Inquiry are asking for just that, the past MUST be dealt with before we can live for the moment and dream of the future. For how can anyone have pleasant dreams when there are so many tragic nightmares. The honesty and justice for the past will close the book on this subject for most and give them what everyone deserves, the right to pursue a good life FREE from events that happened that were beyond our control, but in the control of those who swore to protect us. The ones that were elected, appointed or hired to be sure justice prevailed, must stand back and have a look at what is happening before our very eyes and recognize at what point did these problems from the past cross their desk and at what point did they make that conscious decision to allow the evil to continue with little or no resistance. We would not be where we are today if even one man refused to compromise their integrity and fought for truth and justice with Perry Dunlop. What a lesson learned from his imprisonment eh? All will be punished for telling the truth and those who corrupt their morals and lie with us will be rewarded-"was that the message the courts were giving us?" I love my country and find it so hard to accept this could happen, while being investigated right in front of our eyes. So many people were allowed to continue their lies while those seeking or testifying the truth were placed in the to be "silenced pile". We could almost see the guilty growing horns as we watched them squirm on the stand. I am glad, in time, I decided to continue with this fight for truth. I am proud to say the wedge that was being driven between Brigette and I has been removed and we continue to support each other. Cornwall once again almost cost me the one I love. This Inquiry has cost so many so much I really do hope the proper conclusion is reached and given so all this suffering is not in vein. I do think most people will fight for what they believe in and after all that, to be victimized again. I have seen more than enough to convince me of a MASSIVE COVER-UP. The problem will be the people who have advanced their lives and bank accounts from the suffering of victims. The highest hurdle to overcome is that the opportunists that took advantage of the lack of consequences for illegal actins that they helped create. I for one would not be proud of how far I'd come, if it was only because I used the pain and suffering of a victim, who's lives I have destroyed. I could not spend one dollar if it came from the suffering of children. Actions are what makes us who we are and I may not have a lot but I can proudly say nothing I have, came from the suffering of others. The only one you really must live with is yourself! Can you imagine trying to do that if you had nothing to be proud of? How many material things would you trade to cleanse your soul? I would trade everything but bad news for all those perpetrators, the world doesn't work like that. All of the evil one does, follows you for the rest of your life. For those who believe, read your bible, God loves all of us but I sure wouldn't want to pass from this life having God mad at me, for God, justice "IS JUSTICE". So to you people that have ruined so many lives, and you know who you are, even if this Inquiry doesn't get you, there is NO WAY TO ESCAPE THE INEVITABLE! Also remember there are lots of lawyers where your going, but I don't think they can help you. There you stand alone and the big guy knows the TRUTH!

By:Jim

Saturday, October 25, 2008

New deadlines set by province! "Cornwall Public Inquiry"

Local News
Home news Local News Inquiry will wrap by January: Glaude
Inquiry will wrap by January: Glaude
Commissioner reveals new deadlines set by province
Updated 1 day ago


The final witness will leave the stand at the Cornwall Public Inquiry by January 30, 2009, commissioner Normand Glaude announced this morning.

Glaude said the inquiry's recently amended order-in-council now requires his final report to be delivered no later than July 31 of next year.

"A commissioner is subject to the directions of lawful authorities. Cabinet has directed this inquiry in terms of the timing of the end of testimony, timing of submissions, and timing of the report," said Glaude.

"I intend to do everything I can to meet the timelines established."

Since testimony began in February 2006, the long-running probe into how institutions responded to allegations of historical abuse has heard from 146 witnesses, including victims, police officers, church officials, probation officers, and social workers.

The inquiry has yet to hear from the local school boards, the Ontario Provincial Police and the Ministry of the Attorney General.

The OPP's four-year Project Truth investigation into allegations that a pedophile ring existed in Cornwall was one of the key factors that sparked the inquiry.

"This turns our main focus this winter to the consideration of submissions and the writing of the report of the inquiry," said Glaude.

Counselling support under the inquiry's Phase 2 mandate will still continue until 90 days after the release of Glaude's report.

More to come.

Advertisement



Article ID# 1261719




Comments on this Article.You are currently logged in
i believe this inquirey was answered way before it started.just had to make it look good.
Reply | Report | Page Top Post #1 By luckyred, 1 day ago | -1 Votes | Vote: I don't know what the worry is or why the sudden rush.
The Final Report for the Cornwall Publiy Inquiry was written a long time ago. The Fix was in in 2005 with the appointment of a judge with Cornwall connections and a faulty mandate for an Inquiry.
In case anyone missed it - here are the results :
1. There is and never was a paediphile ring operating in Cornwall or surrounding area
2. There is now and never was a cover-up
3. People didn't understand what child sexual abuse was during the 60's, 70's and 80's
4. People did not know that men did sexually abuse children
5. Lack of funding, lack of staff, lack of training, lack of resources contributed to the problems
6. Mistakes were made, some incompetence, some negligence but nothing of any merit to deal with the real issues.
7. No policies, practices and procedures were in place to tell people what to do or how to do it but things are evolving and they`ve come a long way since the 60's, 70's and 80's
8. Perry Dunlop was a rogue cop who didn`t co-operate and caused a big mess by spreading false rumors
9. Witnesses lied to and strung Dunlop and others along - then they recanted all their stories at the Inquiry.
10. Reputations of countless honourable citizens have been sullied by rumour and induendo.
THERE YOU HAVE IT - THE FINAL REPORT OF THE CORNWALL PUBLIC INQUIRY - WRITTEN IN APRIL 2005.
Reply | Report | Page Top Post #2 By RealityChecker , 1 day ago | 0 Votes | Vote: To Validate your report you need a seconder (r.c)
Reply | Report | Page Top Post #3 By 2 sides 2 a story, 22 hours ago | 0 Votes | Vote: Reality Checker, where can we get an official copy of this report?

Fast track proceedings will hurt the victims!

Local News
Home news Local News Likewise says Jamie Marsolais, an abuse victim
Likewise says Jamie Marsolais, an abuse victim
Posted By
Posted 20 hours ago


Standard-Freeholder CORNWALL

One of the sexual abuse victims who testified at the Cornwall Public Inquiry says the province's decision to fast track proceedings has come out of nowhere and will only serve to hurt Phase 2 healing for victims.

The Ministry of the Attorney General's Office, in collaboration with Inquiry Commissioner Norman Glaude, has set Jan. 30, 2009 as the last day for testimony.

"You don't change ways when you're in the home stretch," said Jamie Marsolais, who was sexually abused by two men when he was a young boy in the early 1980s.

"It's nice to have a final date, but now you have a rushed date," he added.

Marsolais and other inquiry players are questioning the timing of the decision by the ministry.

Institutions such as the Cornwall Community Police Service underwent questioning for months, but the ministry itself, seen by many as a key component to finding answers, will be dealt with at a much quicker pace.

"This gives ammunition to the conspiracy theorists," said Marsolais, who last testified at the inquiry in October of 2007. "This comes right before the two main witnesses are scheduled to testify. I'm not saying this was the (province's) intention, but it adds fuel to the fire. Why start trying to be efficient now? The timing is just wrong."

While Attorney General Chris Bentley says he's simply eager to get the inquiry's recommendations to the people of Ontario as quickly as possible, he wouldn't say why the decision was made now.

He did note, however, that the inquiry will hit the three-year mark in February.

"I'm confident there will be enough time for the important information to come out," Bentley said of the remaining witnesses. "We want to move on the recommendations provided."

Continued After Advertisement Below

Advertisement


There are some 20 to 30 witnesses left to testify, including institutions such as the OPP and local school boards.

Bentley disagreed with Marsolais' view that pieces of the inquiry puzzle will remain unsolved with the new timeline.

Marsolais said this latest development is likely to further divide the community, especially those involved in Phase 2 inquiry projects.

"True healing is not going to happen now because someone wasn't thinking straight," Marsolais said of the ministry. "This could be the final nail in the coffin when it comes to Phase 2 healing and reconciliation."

Glaude announced yesterday that some Phase 2 activities may be affected by the new timeline, but Marsolais said he's confident that his own youth shelter project will not be one of them. His proposal is due Dec. 31.

Marsolais said he's tried to be optimistic about the inquiry's progress, but finds it hard after hearing about decisions such as this one.

Marsolais was sexually abused by James Lewis, a city man, and Richard Hickerson, a Manpower Canada employee who has since passed away.

Friday, October 24, 2008

CORNWALL PUBLIC INQUIRY "Please read the comments"

Local News
Home News Local News Suspension not considered: O'Brien
Suspension not considered: O'Brien
CORNWALL PUBLIC INQUIRY
Posted By TREVOR PRITCHARD, STANDARD-FREEHOLDER
Posted 18 hours ago


The former executive director of the Children's Aid Society never considered suspending an employee accused of physically and sexually abusing children at a group home in the 1970s, the Cornwall Public Inquiry heard Wednesday.

Thomas O'Brien testified that he let Bryan Keough continue to oversee foster homes while Cornwall police investigated the allegations of former CAS ward Jeannette Antoine because he didn't feel there was a chance that other children were at risk.

"He would have no way of disciplining those children. That would have been the responsibility of the foster parents, not Mr. Keough," said O'Brien, who ran the local CAS branch from 1966 until 1990.

The inquiry is exploring how institutions like the CAS handled allegations of historical sexual abuse.

In 1976, staff at the agency's Second Street group home all resigned after some of the children staying there brought forward allegations of demeaning physical abuse to the CAS.

Keough was not a permanent employee at the home. However, O'Brien told the inquiry Wednesday he would often help out there because he was friends with Derry Tenger, the home's director.

"Mr. Keough and Mr. Tenger had the same attitude about physical punishment," said O'Brien. "They were much more rigid than I was (about) how you could properly discipline a child."

Thirteen years later, in August 1989, the group home allegations again ended up on the CAS's radar.

That summer, Antoine told agency caseworkers about the widespread physical and sexual abuse she saw while she was at the home. When she testified at the inquiry in 2006, Antoine singled out Keough as one of the main perpetrators of the abuse, which included forcing teenage girls to scrub floors wearing only their underwear.

O'Brien spoke once with Antoine about her accusations in August 1989.

According to his notes, Antoine was "specific about her dislike for Bryan Keough" during the phone call, and wondered why the CAS would still be employing Keough "after the way he had treated the children."

Continued After Advertisement Below

Advertisement


O'Brien told commission counsel Pierre Dumais that he wanted to speak again with Antoine, to get more information, but never succeeded in reaching her.

While he informed both Cornwall police and the Crown attorney's office of the allegations, O'Brien said he never suspended or disciplined Keough.

"I know that I was in a quandary as to what the law would say," said O'Brien. "And that's why I involved myself with the Crown attorney and the deputy chief of police."

When pressed, O'Brien admitted that had the allegations been made against a non-CAS employee, the agency "probably" would have probed deeper.

Inquiry commissioner Normand Glaude wanted to know why that didn't happen.

"There was a lot of uncertainty," said O'Brien. "I'm not excusing my actions.

"I wasn't sure what to do."

Police investigated Antoine's allegations twice, but never laid any charges.

Keough denied assaulting children at the group home when he took the stand earlier this month.

Under cross-examination, O'Brien told Citizens for Community Renewal lawyer Helen Daley that although he did not agree with the use of corporal punishment in foster homes or by CAS workers, the agency had no written policy forbidding it.

O'Brien told Daley while it was possible Antoine's allegations of physical punishment at Keough's hands were true, he had trouble believing the alleged sexual abuse.

Prior to yesterday's hearing, there had been concerns from lawyers that O'Brien - who testified Wednesday while hooked up to an oxygen machine - would be too ill to complete his cross-examination.

Those fears seemed to abate yesterday after O'Brien, in his mid-70s, spent almost the entire day on the stand, appearing eager to wrap up his testimony as quickly as possible.

O'Brien is scheduled to continue testifying when the inquiry resumes this morning.

Article ID# 1260409




Comments on this Article.You are currently not logged in
I guarantee you if it had been reported that I or any other member of the public had been reported to have been abusing children that they would have investigated us but no not this guy because he is a member of the staff of the group home so essentially an employee of the CAS. These people have way too much power and no one watches them to see if they are doing what is right for the children.
Reply | Report | Page Top Post #1 By dodger, 18 hours ago | -1 Votes | Vote: Dodger

I beleive that at the time most of this abuse took place nobbody would have been investigated to any great extent.

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #2 By itinerant, 17 hours ago | 0 Votes | Vote: People, there is a great difference between being 'accused/alleged' to have physically and/or sexually abusing - then being 'found guilty of'. I agree that the whole issue was treated differently back in the 70's & 80's > my goodness, parents were still using corporal punishment, schools were still strapping children on the hand if they misbehaved.... but
society as a whole has come a long way from that - no longer are we adhering to the use of physical punishment with children because we have learned as a culture that it can cause permanent damage to a child's self esteem, identity, and ability to grow into strong and independent adults....
Dodger, get a grip in regards to CAS people having way to much power and no one watches them to see if they are doing what is right for the children. This statement is simply not based on the reality of the past many years - maybe, just maybe, in the earlier days workers were ill-eguipped to deal properly with the multitude of child protection concerns that they were faced with every day, and maybe, just maybe, some unqualified folk took their personal views of punishment over the edge towards harming a child (inexcuseable to me), but the CAS system simply DOES NOT allow for this to occur any more. Workers are heavily screened before employment, workers are educated in social work practice, workers are supervised, and supervisors are supervised.... child abuse of any nature is taken very seriously, and no matter who the 'alleged perp' is - all possible steps are taken to protect the child from harm.
Dodger, don't you think that it might be time for you to come forward and being the healing process - become part of the solution - rather than staying stuck in your anger and pain? Negative forces hinder the healing you know.

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #3 By looking at the larger picture, 17 hours ago | 1 Votes | Vote: Come forward for what to become a target of these people with the power. THey use their power and do abuse it I know from experience. Yes I am angry but i do realize that power without any boundaries leads to abuse of power. And my experience is from in the last 10 years not from the 1970's or 1980's. If a worker takes a dislike to a particular person they can make their life hell with or without proof. Simply by them keeping notes that they wrote does not make their accusations the truth. I can write false notes that doesn't make my notes the truth. Oh yes one thing I have learned is that it depends on who is accused if it is one of their friends not much action is taken. Do I want to expose myself to further abuse by coming forward no thank you very much.
Reply | Report | Page Top Post #4 By dodger, 16 hours ago | -1 Votes | Vote: I do know that there are some very professional people that work for the CAS and yes some very reasonable people also but the ones that abuse their power take so long to be removed that the damage is allready done they ruin families virtually tear them to pieces simply because of a conflict of personalities. If I say anything more i will expose myself if i am too specific me I don't have the strength to fight them again. Spent ten's of thousands of dollars doing it yes we were exonerated but it took so long and a judge made the decision thank god the judge was a level headed person.
Reply | Report | Page Top Post #5 By dodger, 15 hours ago | 0 Votes | Vote: well written "looking ta the big picture"

You are very right! It was done but now we have to get over it, sitting and holding ire is a bad way to live
Reply | Report | Page Top Post #6 By itinerant, 15 hours ago | 0 Votes | Vote: I will never ever trust any worker from the CAS what they say and what they do it two different things. I am over it just stating my point of view on this stuff. Oh yes one of the requirements of becoming a CAS worker should be that they have some child raising experience of their own not just text book reading about how children should be raised. Many of the workers have never raised a child of their own so how would they know how to handle a particular problem with a child.
Reply | Report | Page Top Post #7 By dodger, 14 hours ago | 0 Votes | Vote: oh Dodger,
CAS workers are hired to be Social Workers with an educational background in child development, and much more. It is not a requirement for employment that they have direct parenting experience. Further, while direct parenting experience can be a benefit - it does not give any worker an inner working knowledge of how others should parent - these are their personal views. All workers are required to follow the standards that are set forth by the Ministry of Child & Family Services Act. Therefore, what they would have to evaluate should they enter any ones home, has to be based on what the Ministry standards are - not their own personal views of parenting.
The CAS trains their workers in this practice. CAS also offers any one that feels that a 'personality conflict' is possibly causing an unjust or unrealistic view of the family's situation - the opportunity to a formal complaint procedure. Even an in formal complaint and a request for a supervisor to review the situation is afforded in every situation - if needed. think about this.....
Also Dodger, I am not suggesting that you 'expose' yourself; that is not needed in order for you to heal from past negative experiences. But I am asking you to consider how your negative, often point blank, opinions herein affect others in our community. If you look at that part, inside of yourself, you might realize that you are giving a lot of wasted energy to your anger and resentment - rather than trying to be at peace with your life and the lives of others that surround you. let go....
Reply | Report | Page Top Post #8 By looking at the larger picture, 13 hours ago | 1 Votes | Vote: Whoever you are you obviously have info on the inner workings of the CAS and I did complain but the worker was protected. And until you have been in my shoes you have no right to tell me to do with my life. I feel like you are a worker also because you just talked down to me like i was a child. I appreciate you want me to heal but I don't want healing I want my family back together that will heal me. Easy for someone else to sit and judge another person when they have not been through their lives nor experienced their pain. Have you ever lost a family member but that member is not dead. Not able to see that member unless someone else is watching your every move like a criminal yet no criminal charges have been laid. All across ontario this same stuff is happening to other families. Well I have to stop talking because it does no good. You go on and heal yourself I will deal with my own problems yes problems that were not caused by me.
Reply | Report | Page Top Post #9 By dodger, 5 hours ago | 0 Votes | Vote: look at this larger picture heal yourself not me
Reply | Report | Page Top Post #10 By dodger, 4 hours ago | 0 Votes | Vote:
Discuss this Article

CORNWALL PUBLIC INQUIRY "Please read the comments"

Local News
Home News Local News Suspension not considered: O'Brien
Suspension not considered: O'Brien
CORNWALL PUBLIC INQUIRY
Posted By TREVOR PRITCHARD, STANDARD-FREEHOLDER
Posted 18 hours ago


The former executive director of the Children's Aid Society never considered suspending an employee accused of physically and sexually abusing children at a group home in the 1970s, the Cornwall Public Inquiry heard Wednesday.

Thomas O'Brien testified that he let Bryan Keough continue to oversee foster homes while Cornwall police investigated the allegations of former CAS ward Jeannette Antoine because he didn't feel there was a chance that other children were at risk.

"He would have no way of disciplining those children. That would have been the responsibility of the foster parents, not Mr. Keough," said O'Brien, who ran the local CAS branch from 1966 until 1990.

The inquiry is exploring how institutions like the CAS handled allegations of historical sexual abuse.

In 1976, staff at the agency's Second Street group home all resigned after some of the children staying there brought forward allegations of demeaning physical abuse to the CAS.

Keough was not a permanent employee at the home. However, O'Brien told the inquiry Wednesday he would often help out there because he was friends with Derry Tenger, the home's director.

"Mr. Keough and Mr. Tenger had the same attitude about physical punishment," said O'Brien. "They were much more rigid than I was (about) how you could properly discipline a child."

Thirteen years later, in August 1989, the group home allegations again ended up on the CAS's radar.

That summer, Antoine told agency caseworkers about the widespread physical and sexual abuse she saw while she was at the home. When she testified at the inquiry in 2006, Antoine singled out Keough as one of the main perpetrators of the abuse, which included forcing teenage girls to scrub floors wearing only their underwear.

O'Brien spoke once with Antoine about her accusations in August 1989.

According to his notes, Antoine was "specific about her dislike for Bryan Keough" during the phone call, and wondered why the CAS would still be employing Keough "after the way he had treated the children."

Continued After Advertisement Below

Advertisement


O'Brien told commission counsel Pierre Dumais that he wanted to speak again with Antoine, to get more information, but never succeeded in reaching her.

While he informed both Cornwall police and the Crown attorney's office of the allegations, O'Brien said he never suspended or disciplined Keough.

"I know that I was in a quandary as to what the law would say," said O'Brien. "And that's why I involved myself with the Crown attorney and the deputy chief of police."

When pressed, O'Brien admitted that had the allegations been made against a non-CAS employee, the agency "probably" would have probed deeper.

Inquiry commissioner Normand Glaude wanted to know why that didn't happen.

"There was a lot of uncertainty," said O'Brien. "I'm not excusing my actions.

"I wasn't sure what to do."

Police investigated Antoine's allegations twice, but never laid any charges.

Keough denied assaulting children at the group home when he took the stand earlier this month.

Under cross-examination, O'Brien told Citizens for Community Renewal lawyer Helen Daley that although he did not agree with the use of corporal punishment in foster homes or by CAS workers, the agency had no written policy forbidding it.

O'Brien told Daley while it was possible Antoine's allegations of physical punishment at Keough's hands were true, he had trouble believing the alleged sexual abuse.

Prior to yesterday's hearing, there had been concerns from lawyers that O'Brien - who testified Wednesday while hooked up to an oxygen machine - would be too ill to complete his cross-examination.

Those fears seemed to abate yesterday after O'Brien, in his mid-70s, spent almost the entire day on the stand, appearing eager to wrap up his testimony as quickly as possible.

O'Brien is scheduled to continue testifying when the inquiry resumes this morning.

Article ID# 1260409




Comments on this Article.You are currently not logged in
I guarantee you if it had been reported that I or any other member of the public had been reported to have been abusing children that they would have investigated us but no not this guy because he is a member of the staff of the group home so essentially an employee of the CAS. These people have way too much power and no one watches them to see if they are doing what is right for the children.
Reply | Report | Page Top Post #1 By dodger, 18 hours ago | -1 Votes | Vote: Dodger

I beleive that at the time most of this abuse took place nobbody would have been investigated to any great extent.

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #2 By itinerant, 17 hours ago | 0 Votes | Vote: People, there is a great difference between being 'accused/alleged' to have physically and/or sexually abusing - then being 'found guilty of'. I agree that the whole issue was treated differently back in the 70's & 80's > my goodness, parents were still using corporal punishment, schools were still strapping children on the hand if they misbehaved.... but
society as a whole has come a long way from that - no longer are we adhering to the use of physical punishment with children because we have learned as a culture that it can cause permanent damage to a child's self esteem, identity, and ability to grow into strong and independent adults....
Dodger, get a grip in regards to CAS people having way to much power and no one watches them to see if they are doing what is right for the children. This statement is simply not based on the reality of the past many years - maybe, just maybe, in the earlier days workers were ill-eguipped to deal properly with the multitude of child protection concerns that they were faced with every day, and maybe, just maybe, some unqualified folk took their personal views of punishment over the edge towards harming a child (inexcuseable to me), but the CAS system simply DOES NOT allow for this to occur any more. Workers are heavily screened before employment, workers are educated in social work practice, workers are supervised, and supervisors are supervised.... child abuse of any nature is taken very seriously, and no matter who the 'alleged perp' is - all possible steps are taken to protect the child from harm.
Dodger, don't you think that it might be time for you to come forward and being the healing process - become part of the solution - rather than staying stuck in your anger and pain? Negative forces hinder the healing you know.

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #3 By looking at the larger picture, 17 hours ago | 1 Votes | Vote: Come forward for what to become a target of these people with the power. THey use their power and do abuse it I know from experience. Yes I am angry but i do realize that power without any boundaries leads to abuse of power. And my experience is from in the last 10 years not from the 1970's or 1980's. If a worker takes a dislike to a particular person they can make their life hell with or without proof. Simply by them keeping notes that they wrote does not make their accusations the truth. I can write false notes that doesn't make my notes the truth. Oh yes one thing I have learned is that it depends on who is accused if it is one of their friends not much action is taken. Do I want to expose myself to further abuse by coming forward no thank you very much.
Reply | Report | Page Top Post #4 By dodger, 16 hours ago | -1 Votes | Vote: I do know that there are some very professional people that work for the CAS and yes some very reasonable people also but the ones that abuse their power take so long to be removed that the damage is allready done they ruin families virtually tear them to pieces simply because of a conflict of personalities. If I say anything more i will expose myself if i am too specific me I don't have the strength to fight them again. Spent ten's of thousands of dollars doing it yes we were exonerated but it took so long and a judge made the decision thank god the judge was a level headed person.
Reply | Report | Page Top Post #5 By dodger, 15 hours ago | 0 Votes | Vote: well written "looking ta the big picture"

You are very right! It was done but now we have to get over it, sitting and holding ire is a bad way to live
Reply | Report | Page Top Post #6 By itinerant, 15 hours ago | 0 Votes | Vote: I will never ever trust any worker from the CAS what they say and what they do it two different things. I am over it just stating my point of view on this stuff. Oh yes one of the requirements of becoming a CAS worker should be that they have some child raising experience of their own not just text book reading about how children should be raised. Many of the workers have never raised a child of their own so how would they know how to handle a particular problem with a child.
Reply | Report | Page Top Post #7 By dodger, 14 hours ago | 0 Votes | Vote: oh Dodger,
CAS workers are hired to be Social Workers with an educational background in child development, and much more. It is not a requirement for employment that they have direct parenting experience. Further, while direct parenting experience can be a benefit - it does not give any worker an inner working knowledge of how others should parent - these are their personal views. All workers are required to follow the standards that are set forth by the Ministry of Child & Family Services Act. Therefore, what they would have to evaluate should they enter any ones home, has to be based on what the Ministry standards are - not their own personal views of parenting.
The CAS trains their workers in this practice. CAS also offers any one that feels that a 'personality conflict' is possibly causing an unjust or unrealistic view of the family's situation - the opportunity to a formal complaint procedure. Even an in formal complaint and a request for a supervisor to review the situation is afforded in every situation - if needed. think about this.....
Also Dodger, I am not suggesting that you 'expose' yourself; that is not needed in order for you to heal from past negative experiences. But I am asking you to consider how your negative, often point blank, opinions herein affect others in our community. If you look at that part, inside of yourself, you might realize that you are giving a lot of wasted energy to your anger and resentment - rather than trying to be at peace with your life and the lives of others that surround you. let go....
Reply | Report | Page Top Post #8 By looking at the larger picture, 13 hours ago | 1 Votes | Vote: Whoever you are you obviously have info on the inner workings of the CAS and I did complain but the worker was protected. And until you have been in my shoes you have no right to tell me to do with my life. I feel like you are a worker also because you just talked down to me like i was a child. I appreciate you want me to heal but I don't want healing I want my family back together that will heal me. Easy for someone else to sit and judge another person when they have not been through their lives nor experienced their pain. Have you ever lost a family member but that member is not dead. Not able to see that member unless someone else is watching your every move like a criminal yet no criminal charges have been laid. All across ontario this same stuff is happening to other families. Well I have to stop talking because it does no good. You go on and heal yourself I will deal with my own problems yes problems that were not caused by me.
Reply | Report | Page Top Post #9 By dodger, 5 hours ago | 0 Votes | Vote: look at this larger picture heal yourself not me
Reply | Report | Page Top Post #10 By dodger, 4 hours ago | 0 Votes | Vote:
Discuss this Article